Useit.com
Usability Assignment (due Nov. 9)
Useit.com > Participation Inequality
Article: “Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute” (October 9, 2006)
Summary:
This article is about how many people on-line are merely “lurkers,” people who just read or view information on a social network, blog or discussion board, without actually contributing to any interactive online feature. The percentages vary, as to which type of online destination is visited. Very few people are “contributors,” people who actually submit opinions, reviews, or informative data to the site. In general, the numbers are that 90% of internet users are lurkers, 9% contribute a little, and 1% is active users who contribute most of the information read at a site. All this information is on average.
Most people don’t contribute anything to a site, they simply read and observe what other people post. This is known as “participation inequality,” first studied by Will Hill during the 1990’s. These inequities between users as far as their participation to an interactive website goes, results in a biased understanding of the web community. There are strong differences as to why some people actively post a lot of content on a site, while many others (the majority) just lurks around and watches what others are talking about.
With the standard inequity ratio among online web communities being 90-9-1%, blogs have a bad participation inequality reflected in a 95-5-0 rule. With wikipedia.com, the inequities are worse as 99% of people who visit the site are lurkers. Amazon, widely known for its feature for people to post and read reviews, actually only gets reviews from 1% of its visitors to the website!
Problems with inequality, is that the samples represent a skewed portion of actual web users. The numbers account for just a portion of all of the people who are online, all of who are very different in their preferences, tastes, habits, etc. With any site, hearing from the same small percentage of people who actually contribute to the site can add many problems, such as an unrepresentative sample of customer feedback, reviews from a small number of the population (which cannot really be generalized), biased politics, search engine results based on popularity and number of links to the site instead of behavioral tendencies of consumers, and low quality postings which take away from the important information on a site.
Implications of the article:
The article implies that participation inequality is very common in the Internet world; and this is how it will always be. The majority of Internet users are lurkers. The article suggests that participation inequality is not something that can be overcome. There are some ways to come closer to equalizing it, however, such as: making it easier for visitors to contribute such as through a star-rating system instead of actually having to type out a review, making participation a side-effect with little to no effort such as simply clicking on preferences, allow readers the ease of editing a pre-created layout instead of having to make something themselves from scratch, and rewarding contributors, especially those who contribute quality material.
My opinion:
I DO agree with the author, partially because I have experience on both sides of the spectrum. I have visited websites as a “lurker,” reading postings, opinions and reviews left by other visitors. That is my regimen most of the time I am on a site- I think that my input is not really necessary, and therefore do not want to spend the time to write something out, unless it is something I am extremely passionate about. Most of the time, I feel that my input will get drowned out amongst a sea of people doing the same thing – writing on a topic; with many peoples’ opinions/contributions similar to each other, many times repetitive and not worth reading.
I also have a blog and interactive website/personal page, in which I would love to get viewer contributions. Counters tell me that people are visiting the site, but few leave any trace of their doing so, such as a comment or posting of any sort. I assume their actions are so, for the same reasons I do not post on blogs- because I don’t think it is of importance to my doing so, and I don’t want to waste my time. It could also be for their fear of anyone commenting back towards them, and criticizing what they posted. All in all, I do believe the author’s main message that many people simply visit websites and online communities to simply read and observe, without contributing input or opinions of any kind.






